1951 Citroen 2CV vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1974 Volvo 140 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (95 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1951 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1951 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Citroen 2CV | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | 140 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 95 HP |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2620 mm |
