1951 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1951 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1951 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2006 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1951 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1951 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 374 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |
