1951 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1951 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1951 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Citroen | Citroen |
| Model | 2CV | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
