1951 DKW F 89 vs. 1962 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1962 Volvo P 1800 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volvo P 1800 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volvo P 1800 should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volvo P 1800 weights approximately 226 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 DKW F 89 | 1962 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | F 89 | P 1800 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2460 mm |