1951 DKW F 89 vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Volvo 164 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89.
Because 1980 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 DKW F 89 | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | F 89 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3350 mm |
