1951 DKW F 89 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 586 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 DKW F 89 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | F 89 | 260 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2660 mm |