1951 DKW F 89 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 200 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 DKW F 89 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
