1951 DKW F 89 vs. 1998 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1998 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volkswagen Polo (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 96 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 DKW F 89 | 1998 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
Model | F 89 | Polo |
Year Released | 1951 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2410 mm |