1951 DKW F 89 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1461 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 DKW F 89 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3510 mm |
