1951 DKW F 89 vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 DKW F 89 weights approximately 189 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 DKW F 89 | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | DKW | Lotus |
Model | F 89 | M250 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2520 mm |