1951 DKW F 89 vs. 2002 Ford F-250
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-250 (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 DKW F 89. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1951 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1951 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 DKW F 89 | 2002 Ford F-250 | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 89 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2040 mm |