1951 DKW F 89 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 851 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 DKW F 89 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2990 mm |
