1951 DKW F 89 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (194 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 425 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 DKW F 89 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | F 89 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
