1951 DKW F 89 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 DKW F 89 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | DKW | Nissan |
Model | F 89 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2360 mm |