1951 Ferrari 212 vs. 1959 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1959 Triumph TR3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,562 cc (12 cylinders), 1951 Ferrari 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Ferrari 212 (140 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1959 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Ferrari 212 should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Triumph TR3 weights approximately 1 kg more than 1951 Ferrari 212.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Ferrari 212 | 1959 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Ferrari | Triumph |
Model | 212 | TR3 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2562 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 924 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 29 L |