1951 Ferrari 212 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1951 Ferrari 212. (169 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1951 Ferrari 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 410 kg more than 1951 Ferrari 212. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Ferrari 212 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ferrari | Renault |
Model | 212 | Clio |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2562 cc | 2945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1410 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 159 L | 61 L |