1951 Ferrari 212 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1951 Ferrari 212. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1951 Ferrari 212.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Ferrari 212. (216 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Ferrari 212.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Ferrari 212 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Ferrari | Holden |
| Model | 212 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2562 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
