1951 Fiat 1400 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1951 Fiat 1400. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1951 Fiat 1400.
Because 1951 Fiat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Fiat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Fiat 1400 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1400 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1393 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2490 mm |