1951 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 430 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1951 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Fiat Campagnola | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Campagnola | Elan |
Year Released | 1951 | 1968 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2440 mm |