1951 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 280 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1951 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1951 Fiat Campagnola has manual transmission. 1951 Fiat Campagnola will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Fiat Campagnola | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | Campagnola | Smart |
Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 73 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |