1951 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 530 kg more than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Fiat Campagnola | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Campagnola | Tundra |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3270 mm |