1951 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (63 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 57 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1951 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Fiat Campagnola | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Fiat | Volkswagen |
Model | Campagnola | Polo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1193 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2520 mm |