1951 Ford Custom vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ford Custom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ford Custom would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Ford Custom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1951 Ford Custom. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1951 Ford Custom.
Because 1951 Ford Custom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Ford Custom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna has automatic transmission and 1951 Ford Custom has manual transmission. 1951 Ford Custom will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Ford Custom | 1992 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Custom | Magna |
Year Released | 1951 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3917 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2730 mm |