1951 Ford Custom vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton

To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ford Custom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ford Custom would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Ford Custom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1951 Ford Custom. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1951 Ford Custom.

Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Ford Custom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Ford Custom 2006 SsangYong Rexton
Make Ford SsangYong
Model Custom Rexton
Year Released 1951 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3917 cc 2696 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 100 HP 163 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 4730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2830 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]