1951 Ford Taunus vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1963 Zastava 1300 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1951 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1951 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1951 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Ford Taunus | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Taunus | 1300 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2430 mm |