1951 Ford Zephyr vs. 2000 Opel Corsa
To start off, 2000 Opel Corsa is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Ford Zephyr (151 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Corsa. (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1951 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Corsa.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Ford Zephyr | 2000 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Zephyr | Corsa |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 151 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2450 mm |