1951 GAZ M-20 vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1951 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1951 GAZ M-20.
Because 1951 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 GAZ M-20 | 2012 Renault Megane | |
| Make | GAZ | Renault |
| Model | M-20 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |
