1951 Holden FX vs. 1970 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1970 Mazda 1000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda 1000 (66 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda 1000 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Holden FX weights approximately 160 kg more than 1970 Mazda 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 1000. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1951 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Holden FX | 1970 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | 1000 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2270 mm |