1951 Holden FX vs. 1973 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 1973 Monteverdi 2000 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Holden FX | 1973 Monteverdi 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Monteverdi |
| Model | FX | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2560 mm |
