1951 Holden FX vs. 1977 Renault 20

To start off, 1977 Renault 20 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Renault 20 (110 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Renault 20 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Renault 20 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Renault 20 (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1977 Renault 20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: