1951 Holden FX vs. 1977 Renault 4

To start off, 1977 Renault 4 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Holden FX (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1977 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1977 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Holden FX weights approximately 310 kg more than 1977 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Renault 4. (58 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1951 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Renault 4.

Compare all specifications: