1951 Holden FX vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste

To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Holden FX weights approximately 60 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1951 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Holden FX 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
Make Holden Mitsubishi
Model FX Celeste
Year Released 1951 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2166 cc 1410 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 51 HP 74 HP
Torque 136 Nm 118 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 910 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2350 mm