1951 Holden FX vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 1979 Volvo 164 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Holden FX | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | FX | 164 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3350 mm |