1951 Holden FX vs. 1982 Renault 11

To start off, 1982 Renault 11 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Renault 11 (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Holden FX weights approximately 100 kg more than 1982 Renault 11.

Because 1951 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 11. (100 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1951 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 11.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Holden FX 1982 Renault 11
Make Holden Renault
Model FX 11
Year Released 1951 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2166 cc 1397 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 51 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 136 Nm 100 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 870 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2490 mm