1951 Holden FX vs. 1987 Zastava Yugo
To start off, 1987 Zastava Yugo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Zastava Yugo (83 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Zastava Yugo should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX.
Because 1951 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Zastava Yugo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (124 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1951 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Holden FX | 1987 Zastava Yugo | |
Make | Holden | Zastava |
Model | FX | Yugo |
Year Released | 1951 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2510 mm |