1951 Holden FX vs. 2000 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 2000 Skoda Octavia is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Skoda Octavia (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 245 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Skoda Octavia. (134 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1951 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Skoda Octavia.

Compare all specifications: