1951 Holden FX vs. 2005 Toyota Stallion
To start off, 2005 Toyota Stallion is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Stallion (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Stallion should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Stallion weights approximately 366 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Stallion (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Stallion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Holden FX | 2005 Toyota Stallion | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FX | Stallion |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1336 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |