1951 Holden FX vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Holden FX weights approximately 160 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1951 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Holden FX | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | 6 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2964 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |