1951 Holden FX vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 660 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Holden FX | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | Clio |
Year Released | 1951 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |