1951 Holden FX vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Holden FX | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | FX | UTE |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 261 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
