1951 Holden FX vs. 2012 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1951 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1951 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: