1951 Holden FX vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 1049 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera weights approximately 320 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Holden FX | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Holden | Koenigsegg |
Model | FX | Agera |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 1100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |