1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 1983 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1983 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Hudson Hornet (143 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Hudson Hornet | 1983 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Hudson | Volkswagen |
| Model | Hornet | Polo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 39 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2340 mm |
