1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (87 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 675 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Hudson Hornet | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Hudson | Renault |
Model | Hornet | 19 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2550 mm |