1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 1996 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1996 Toyota Carina is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Carina. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Carina.
Because 1951 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Hudson Hornet | 1996 Toyota Carina | |
Make | Hudson | Toyota |
Model | Hornet | Carina |
Year Released | 1951 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |