1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Hudson Hornet (143 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2000 Volvo V40. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo V40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 445 kg more than 2000 Volvo V40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Hudson Hornet | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Hudson | Volvo |
Model | Hornet | V40 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2670 mm |