1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2002 Mazda AZ is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 1050 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Hudson Hornet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1951 Hudson Hornet has manual transmission. 1951 Hudson Hornet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Hudson Hornet | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Hudson | Mazda |
Model | Hornet | AZ |
Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2370 mm |