1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 2006 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2006 Toyota Sienna is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Sienna (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1951 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1951 Hudson Hornet.
Because 1951 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1951 Hudson Hornet has manual transmission. 1951 Hudson Hornet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Hudson Hornet | 2006 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Hudson | Toyota |
| Model | Hornet | Sienna |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 3308 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1970 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3040 mm |
