1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Hudson Hornet (143 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1951 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Hudson Hornet | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Hudson | Ford |
| Model | Hornet | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2490 mm |
