1951 Hudson Hornet vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1951 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1951 Hudson Hornet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Hudson Hornet | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Hudson | Holden |
Model | Hornet | Commodore |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 360 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |